Re: Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02
Jong-Hyouk Lee <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mip6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <8C62554D-A601-47BC-A7EF-85839CFA1075__33978.8445541219$1448901277$gmane$org@gmail.com> |
Hi all I support the adoption of this draft as a WG draft even with the concerns pointed by Mingui. This draft has a merit of the introduction of the generic protocol extension allowing a multihomed MAG to register more than one PCoA to the LMA. It is definitely useful for a multihomed environment. Authors may update this draft to address Mingui’s comments if needed. J. -- Jong-Hyouk Lee, living somewhere between /dev/null and /dev/random Protocol Engineering Lab., Sangmyung University #email: [email protected] #webpage: https://sites.google.com/site/hurryon > On Nov 26, 2015, at 5:00 PM, Mingui Zhang <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I remember it was suggested to remove DSL, “Hybrid Access”, etc, and the suggestion was acknowledged. We haven’t seen an updated version yet. It is not ready to be adopted, I think. > > I have read the draft. I found the scope greatly shrinked from the 01 to 02. I guess the draft wants to fight through by providing a more generic protocol extension, while awaiting for real use cases. And, Hybrid Access could be treated as a potential use case (Actually, the DSL+LTE scenario is now intentionally inherited from the 00 version as a use case.). If I guess right, I don’t think it’s a good starting point since it only covers a fragment of a possible solution. Besides the care of addresses, there are many other gaps that have not been touched: per-packet traffic classification and recombination, performance measurement, the bypass requirement, etc. From the draft, we cannot figure out a clear architectural overview. Section 3 doesn’t help much. > > Hence, I oppose its adoption. > > Thanks, > Mingui > > From: dmm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dapeng Liu > Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 12:22 AM > To: dmm > Subject: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02 > > Hello all, > > In IETF94, we initiated the call for adoption for the draft: > draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02 <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02>: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02 <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02> > Seems have got sufficient support during the meeting. We'd like to confirm the call for adoption in the mailing list for 2 weeks. > Please send your opinion and comments to the list before December 9. > > > Thanks, > ------ > Best Regards, > Dapeng&Jouni > > > > > > -- > > ------ > Best Regards, > Dapeng Liu > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm