Re: Call for adoption confirmation: draft-gundavelli-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params
Alexandre Petrescu <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mip6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <565DB6F3.6040004__5831.11783857948$1448982292$gmane$org@gmail.com> |
Yes, that's what I intended to ask. Alex Le 01/12/2015 15:59, Dhananjay Patki (dhpatki) a écrit : > Hi Alex, > > The PBAs are only in response to the PBUs. If the parameters need to be > sent from the LMA to the MAG in an unsolicited manner to override > previously assigned values, then they could be included in Update > Notification message per RFC 7077. Is that what you intended to ask? > -- > Regards, > Dhananjay > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: dmm <[email protected]> on behalf of Alexandre Petrescu > <[email protected]> > Date: Tuesday, 1 December 2015 8:19 pm > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: > draft-gundavelli-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params > >> I support this draft. >> >> Let me ask: will it be possible for the LMA to send BAcks in an >> unsolicited manner? >> >> Alex >> >> >> Le 25/11/2015 17:02, Dapeng Liu a écrit : >>> Hello all, >>> >>> In IETF94, we initiated the call for adoption for the draft: >>> draft-gundavelli-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params: >>> >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gundavelli-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params >>> Seems have got sufficient support during the meeting. We'd like to >>> confirm the call for adoption in the mailing list for 2 weeks. >>> >>> Please send your opinion and comments to the list before December 9. >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> ------ >>> Best Regards, >>> Dapeng&Jouni >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> ------ >>> Best Regards, >>> Dapeng Liu >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dmm mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dmm mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > >