Re: Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02
Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mip6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <565F5493.6060402__8815.33085271276$1449088174$gmane$org@gmail.com> |
Behcet, 12/2/2015, 11:02 AM, Behcet Sarikaya kirjoitti: > Hi Jouni, > > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]> wrote: >> As an individual contributor I support the adoption of this I-D. MCoA is a >> feature that we still lack.. >> > > Are you sure? > > MCoA is solved in Netext Flow Mobility draft, > > draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-flowmob-14 > > is the latest draft. Sorry for my improper wording regarding which part of the MCoA I meant. I don't see how draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-flowmob-14 would handle the case of registration when the Proxy-CoAs are from the same MAG. The netext draft specifically states Proxy-CoAs are from different MAGs. But it was a good thing you brought this up. The two I-Ds need to be in sync. > > BTW there was an issue in WG adoption call in IETF 93 in Yokohama. The IETF 94 I presume.. AFAIR we did not ask for adoption in IETF 93. > chair asked only those who accept. The chair unfortunately did not ask > those who oppose. > > As you know, if the chair wishes to ask a single question then the > right one is any opposes. Obviously you are right here but I cannot really comment on this what happened in Yokohama since I was not on site or not even participating remotely. Anyway, all adoption calls are confirmed on the mailing list and the "sense of the room" during the meeting merely serves as informative quidance for chairs. - Jouni > > Regards, > > Behcet >> The document itself still needs quite a bit of work. For example, I wonder >> if the caption for Figure 2 is correct. Also, Section 4.1. option fiels >> descriptions are somewhat broken it seems. And so on multiple small nits >> like unexpanded acronyms etc. However, these are mainly editorials. I have >> no problem with the technical solution. >> >> - Jouni >> >> >> >> 11/25/2015, 8:22 AM, Dapeng Liu kirjoitti: >>> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> In IETF94, we initiated the call for adoption for the draft: >>> draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02 >>> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02>: >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02 >>> Seems have got sufficient support during the meeting. We'd like to >>> confirm the call for adoption in the mailing list for 2 weeks. >>> Please send your opinion and comments to the list before December 9. >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> ------ >>> Best Regards, >>> Dapeng&Jouni >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> ------ >>> Best Regards, >>> Dapeng Liu >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dmm mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dmm mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm