Re: Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02
Erunika <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mip6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <5667AA4F.4020201__14127.8388597586$1449634429$gmane$org@inl.ics.keio.ac.jp> |
Hi, I also support the adoption. However, I have a slight concern.I find Figure 1 little too specific and it might mislead the audience. Maybe the wording should be changed in order to emphasize that this is just an instance. Or else, I think the use case should be dropped. However, having an example would be extremely helpful in understanding. So I would suggest the former. Regards, IRU On 12/4/2015 8:01 PM, Alexandre Petrescu wrote: > Hi, > > I support adoption. > > One little note: the -rg- in filename makes think of Research Group. > It would make sense to change the filename to avoid the use of -rg-, > if it's not too complicated. > > Alex > > Le 25/11/2015 17:22, Dapeng Liu a écrit : >> Hello all, >> >> In IETF94, we initiated the call for adoption for the draft: >> draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02 >> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02>: >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02 >> Seems have got sufficient support during the meeting. We'd like to >> confirm the call for adoption in the mailing list for 2 weeks. >> Please send your opinion and comments to the list before December 9. >> >> >> Thanks, >> ------ >> Best Regards, >> Dapeng&Jouni >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> ------ >> Best Regards, >> Dapeng Liu >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dmm mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >> > > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >