Re: Call for adoption confirmation: draft-gundavelli-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params

Erunika <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mip6
Message-ID <56690EA0.50908__25335.2424748757$1449725638$gmane$org@inl.ics.keio.ac.jp>
Hi,

I support this draft.

As a followup to the previous inquiry by Alex, I also noticed that only 
the synchronous configuration is explained in the draft.
Maybe, the asynchronous configuration should also be addressed ?

Regards,
IRU

On 12/10/2015 1:05 PM, h chan wrote:
> I support the draft.
>
> Will there be follow-up on Alex's question - to discuss whether to add the use of LCMP in UPN?
>
> H Anthony Chan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dmm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alexandre Petrescu
> Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 9:04 AM
> To: Dhananjay Patki (dhpatki)
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-gundavelli-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params
>
> Yes, that's what I intended to ask.
>
> Alex
>
> Le 01/12/2015 15:59, Dhananjay Patki (dhpatki) a écrit :
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> The PBAs are only in response to the PBUs. If the parameters need to
>> be sent from the LMA to the MAG in an unsolicited manner to override
>> previously assigned values, then they could be included in Update
>> Notification message per RFC 7077. Is that what you intended to ask?
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Dhananjay
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dmm <[email protected]> on behalf of Alexandre Petrescu
>> <[email protected]>
>> Date: Tuesday, 1 December 2015 8:19 pm
>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation:
>> draft-gundavelli-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params
>>
>>> I support this draft.
>>>
>>> Let me ask: will it be possible for the LMA to send BAcks in an
>>> unsolicited manner?
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 25/11/2015 17:02, Dapeng Liu a écrit :
>>>> Hello all,
>>>>
>>>> In IETF94, we initiated the call for adoption for the draft:
>>>> draft-gundavelli-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params:
>>>>
>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gundavelli-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-p
>>>> arams Seems have got sufficient support during the meeting. We'd
>>>> like to confirm the call for adoption in the mailing list for 2
>>>> weeks.
>>>>
>>>> Please send your opinion and comments to the list before December 9.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> ------
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> Dapeng&Jouni
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> ------
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> Dapeng Liu
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> dmm mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dmm mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.