Re: conclusion of adoption calls

Hi Jouni,


On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Jouni <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Behcet,
>
> Thank you for your constructive comments. I believe academic conferences/journals are not appropriate venues for PMIPv6/MIPv6 maintenance since these protocol families are already past their prime time as “hot research topics".

Are you second guessing conference/journal decision people? Again,
with my academic background I can say that we should stay away from
such things.

Another implication of what you seem to be saying is that these poor
guys can not publish in conferences/journals, dmm should give them a
refuge?

Of course ISE could be a channel, just say go to ISE.

> Looking at the existing charter

As you know charters can be modified. Especially charter items are
easy to be modified, i.e. probably no need to go to IESG. I have seen
chairs modifying charter items, with AD approval.

> I cannot find too much love towards anything IPv4 so I think we can let MIPv4 finally rest in peace.

Maybe that's your thinking, other people may have different opinion.

Behcet
>
> - Jouni
>
>
>> On 21 Dec 2015, at 09:46, Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jouni, all,
>>
>> Let me ask what is the point in maintaining the protocols that no one uses?
>> For academic purposes? If yes, then they should find their places in
>> the conferences or journals.
>>
>> Now, mip4 WG has been closed. So is dmm going to maintain mip4 as well?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Behcet
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi Jouni, all,
>>>
>>> Although I'm already late, I just wanted to express my post-adoption
>>> call to the three drafts.
>>>
>>> Carlos
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2015-12-16 at 08:32 -0800, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
>>>> Folks,
>>>>
>>>> The WG adoption call for all three I-Ds have completed:
>>>>      draft-gundavelli-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-00
>>>>      draft-yan-dmm-hnprenum-03
>>>>      draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02
>>>>
>>>> The adoption for the first two was unanimous. The last (draft-seita-
>>>> *)
>>>> received few concerns but the number of supporters was enough to
>>>> convince the chairs there is enough interest and support to work on
>>>> it.
>>>> The chairs encourage the authors of draft-seite-* to pay close
>>>> attention
>>>> and work out the concerns raised during the adoption call.
>>>>
>>>> For the I-D authors. Please, submit draft-ietf-*-00 versions of the
>>>> documents as soon as possible.
>>>>
>>>> - Jouni & Dapeng
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> dmm mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dmm mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm