Re: WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01

Hi,

I have read this draft and some questions come to my mind. Let me know my
understanding is correct or not first.

Actually, this draft comes to a proposed container option to be delivered by
a PBA message, enabling the LMA to put various parameters related to the MAG
enforcement, not doing it individually for less signaling overhead(?)

And when I saw following sentence

"Configuring aggressive values of parameters such as re-registration timeout
and heartbeat interval can potentially create considerable signaling load on
the LMA."

I was expecting you would take care of it in terms of efficient transmission
perspective as well. Is it out-of-scope, right?



Two minor typos are,

In Introduction, aggresive -> aggressive

in 5.2, reveived -> received(?)


Regards,
Seil Jeon



-----Original Message-----
From: dmm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jouni Korhonen
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 2:14 AM
To: [email protected]; Jouni; 成 鹏
Subject: [DMM] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01

Folks,

This email starts the WGLC #2 for
draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01. Post your comment to the
mailing list and also add your issues/correction requests/concerns etc into
the Issue Tracker.

     WGLC #2 Starts: 6/7/2016
     WGLC #2 Ends: 6/21/2016 EOB PDT

Regards,
     Jouni & Dapeng

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm