Re: WG Adoption call for draft-wt-dmm-deployment-models-00

Dapeng Liu <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mip6
Message-ID <CAKcc6AeeA0gOWLb=3uqjtj-3SdMPbMi=rZ7h3CUTrs1aRzE0Nw__24642.6056176007$1469443923$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com>
Without the chair hat, in general, I think this document is in good shape
and support the adoption.
One comment: Adding signaling flow examples for the deployment models would
be useful to make the document more readable.

Thanks,
Dapeng Liu

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 1:50 AM Seil Jeon <[email protected]> wrote:

> I support this I-D for WG adoption.
>
> Regards,
> Seil Jeon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dmm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jouni
> Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2016 1:57 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: "刘大鹏(鹏成)"
> Subject: [DMM] WG Adoption call for draft-wt-dmm-deployment-models-00
>
> Folks,
>
> As already supported in IETF96 Berlin meeting we are ratifying the adoption
> of draft-wt-dmm-deployment-models-00 as a WG Item. The WG adoption call
> ends
> 8/7/2016. Voice you support or opposition (with a reason why) on the
> mailing
> list.
>
> - Dapeng & Jouni
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.