Re: WG Adoption call for draft-chan-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-08
Alexandre Petrescu <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mip6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <d34b5340-197b-caf7-7e5f-e68e6e610737__13858.3644795746$1470402505$gmane$org@gmail.com> |
Le 24/07/2016 à 06:56, Jouni a écrit : > Folks, > > As already supported in IETF96 Berlin meeting we are ratifying the > adoption of draft-chan-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-08 as a WG > Item. The WG adoption call ends 8/7/2016. Voice you support or > opposition (with a reason why) on the mailing list. I support adoption. I appreciate the direction this draft takes, but I think there are some things to be further clarified: - in addition to being reachable at a particular IP address, it should be considered that an MN may send packets sourced by any address; a mobile webcam can send its video by sourcing with any IP address (provided there is no ingress filtering, which _is_ the case in some networks). - using a route update principle (BGP update, or other) there is necessity to _delete_ the old routes, not only to create new routes. - the role of default routes is very important in explaining the viability of route update mechanisms. If this draft is adopted, which I support, then later on I will help to clarify the draft with respect to these 3 aspects. Nits: > the data plane functions and be centralized but may also co-located > with the data plane function at these distributed anchors. "may also _be_ co-located". Alex