Re: WG Adoption call for draft-chan-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-08

Alexandre Petrescu <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mip6
Message-ID <d34b5340-197b-caf7-7e5f-e68e6e610737__13858.3644795746$1470402505$gmane$org@gmail.com>
Le 24/07/2016 à 06:56, Jouni a écrit :
> Folks,
>
> As already supported in IETF96 Berlin meeting we are ratifying the
> adoption of draft-chan-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-08 as a WG
> Item. The WG adoption call ends 8/7/2016. Voice you support or
> opposition (with a reason why) on the mailing list.

I support adoption.  I appreciate the direction this draft takes, but I 
think there are some things to be further clarified:

- in addition to being reachable at a particular IP address, it should
   be considered that an MN may send packets sourced by any address; a
   mobile webcam can send its video by sourcing with any IP address
   (provided there is no ingress filtering, which _is_ the case in some
   networks).

- using a route update principle (BGP update, or other) there is
   necessity to _delete_ the old routes, not  only to create new routes.

- the role of default routes is very important in explaining the
   viability of route update mechanisms.

If this draft is adopted, which I support, then later on I will help to 
clarify the draft with respect to these 3 aspects.

Nits:
>    the data plane functions and be centralized but may also co-located
>    with the data plane function at these distributed anchors.

"may also _be_ co-located".

Alex
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.