Re: [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-03
神明達哉 <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mip6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJE_bqeF1z9m95UYonts3+NVRwfUgWxByF0a852B-BH1+eBGrA__2934.50397807664$1484592058$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com> |
At Sun, 15 Jan 2017 21:08:41 -0800, Charlie Perkins <[email protected]> wrote: > > - Section 4.5 > > > > 2000, modulo 2^32. Since the link-layer address can be of > > variable > > length [RFC2464], the DUID-LLT is of variable length. > > > > I don't understand why RFC2464 is referenced in this context. This > > RFC is about IPv6 over Ethernet, and assumes a fixed (6 bytes) > > length of hardware address. > > I don't quite know what to do about this. I actually just copied this > language from RFC 3315. I think that the citation is also wrong in RFC > 3315, for the same reason as given here. I could simply delete the > reference to RFC 2464. I don't see "Since the link-layer address can be of variable length [RFC2464], the DUID-LLT is of variable length." in RFC3315. See also the followup comment by Bernie. Deleting the reference will certainly address my concern, and I personally don't mind not having a reference here. -- JINMEI, Tatuya