Re: Change "Port" to ? [ was Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-fpc-cpdp-05.txt]

Satoru Matsushima <[email protected]> Mon, 6 Feb 2017 16:20:25 +0900
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mip6
Message-ID <041B7084-FA37-4C3F-8F72-D07E9948E080__20397.9764985435$1486365644$gmane$org@gmail.com>
+1
--satoru

> 2017/01/26 2:16、Charlie Perkins <[email protected]> のメール:
> 
> Hello Marco,
> 
> What would you think about replacing the term "port" by "virtual port", which would usually be shortened to "vport" (or "Vport")?
> 
> I think it would have several benefits:
> 
> 	• it seems intuitively appealing, at least to me
> 	• it avoids the unacceptable clash with the traditional meanings of the word "port"
> 	• it fits well with my understanding of "data-plane node" and "context".
> 	• it's a relatively easy editorial change to the draft
> Regards,
> Charlie P.
> 

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm