Re: Change "Port" to ? [ was Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-fpc-cpdp-05.txt]
Satoru Matsushima <[email protected]> Mon, 6 Feb 2017 16:20:25 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mip6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <041B7084-FA37-4C3F-8F72-D07E9948E080__20397.9764985435$1486365644$gmane$org@gmail.com> |
+1 --satoru > 2017/01/26 2:16、Charlie Perkins <[email protected]> のメール: > > Hello Marco, > > What would you think about replacing the term "port" by "virtual port", which would usually be shortened to "vport" (or "Vport")? > > I think it would have several benefits: > > • it seems intuitively appealing, at least to me > • it avoids the unacceptable clash with the traditional meanings of the word "port" > • it fits well with my understanding of "data-plane node" and "context". > • it's a relatively easy editorial change to the draft > Regards, > Charlie P. > _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm