Re: draft-matsushima-spring-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane

Thanks Daniel for your reviews.

Folks - Please review and provide your feedback on this document.


Sri

From: dmm <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of "Voyer, Daniel" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Friday, October 13, 2017 at 8:09 AM
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [DMM] draft-matsushima-spring-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane

Hi,
This is very good proposal.

On Section 4. Mobile user plane
The core network doesn't require to be SRv6 - it could be IPv6 only. This demonstrate SRv6 flexibility.

On Section 5.2. Layer-2 Anchor segment
Can you add more explanation to "In downlink, there's no difference between the uplink behavior."

On section 7. Control plane considerations
The centralized controller should be marked as out-of-scope of this document.

Thx
dan

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm