Re: Draft new version: draft-ietf-mmusic-mux-exclusive-11
Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mmusic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2/17/17 3:46 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote: > Hi, > > Based on the comments from Ekr, I've submitted a new version of draft-mux-exclusive. > > The SDP 'rtcp-mux-only' attribute is now only allowed in SDP offers. With the new text the offerer never knows if the answerer supports rtcp-mux-only. He only knows that the answerer supports rtcp-mux. I don't think this matters for that O/A, but it might matter for subsequent O/As. At the least, I think section 4.5 is now confusing. For m-lines previously negotiated with rtcp-mux-only, must the side that is sending a new offer include the attribute again, while the side that is answering must *not* include it? (Note the implications when the new offer is in the opposite direction from the original one.) I think this will be somewhat of a pain - perhaps more pain than simply always including it in all offers and answers. Thanks, Paul > Regards, > > Christer > > > -----Original Message----- > From: mmusic [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] > Sent: 17 February 2017 10:44 > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: [MMUSIC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mmusic-mux-exclusive-11.txt > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > This draft is a work item of the Multiparty Multimedia Session Control of the IETF. > > Title : Indicating Exclusive Support of RTP/RTCP Multiplexing using SDP > Author : Christer Holmberg > Filename : draft-ietf-mmusic-mux-exclusive-11.txt > Pages : 12 > Date : 2017-02-17 > > Abstract: > This document defines a new SDP media-level attribute, 'rtcp-mux- > only', that can be used by an endpoint to indicate exclusive support > of RTP/RTCP multiplexing. The document also updates RFC 5761, by > clarifying that an offerer can use a mechanism to indicate that it is > not able to send and receive RTCP on separate ports. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mmusic-mux-exclusive/ > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-mux-exclusive-11 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mmusic-mux-exclusive-11 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > mmusic mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic > > _______________________________________________ > mmusic mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic >