ICE-SIP-SDP and RFC6544

Suhas Nandakumar <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mmusic
Message-ID <CAMRcRGTPb1UFq9vhR2Ar2tp559UEWeJV2LT09D-Dqu4Q3W-Tbw@mail.gmail.com>
Adam raised a valid point on the scope of RFC6544 in the context of
ice-sip-sdp.

We the authors did consider couple of options and would like the WG's
inputs to decide the next steps

1. Merge in RFC6544 into ice-sip-sdp and ice-bis
   This includes bringing in appropriate text from rfc6544 into ice-bis for
ice processing detail and ice-sip-sdp for candidate encoding + offer/answer
specifics

2. RFC6544bis
   Do a bis version of RFC6544 and make it refer to ICE-BIS and ICE-SIP-SDP
wherever appropriate.

3. Any other option ?

We prefer option 2 given the magnitude of RFC6544 merge plan , but are open
to suggestions from either or a new option altogether

please advise.


Cheers
Suhas

_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.