Re: FW: [rtcweb] How to signal RTX SSRCs with simulcast
Bo Burman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mmusic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <AM5PR0701MB257767A071B4BAE79A9DFE878D250@AM5PR0701MB2577.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Iñaki Baz Castillo [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: den 13 mars 2017 12:50 > > 2017-03-13 12:41 GMT+01:00 Bo Burman <[email protected]>: > > Could you elaborate a bit to help me understand why that would be needed for FLEX-FEC when using > RepairedRtpStreamId? > > I just meant that, in case of option A above, FLEX-FEC would require the same as RTX (when RID is in use and ssrcs are > therefore not signaled). [BoB] OK > > > > I guess that use of RtpStreamId or RepairedRtpStreamId on RTP level (in the RTP and RTCP packets) should not matter > much, neither for FLEX-FEC nor RTX, as long as it is clearly defined what it means? > > I'm not against it. It's just that this requires a new draft about RID and "complementary streams" (or include it into > existing ones). [BoB] Usage of RepairedRtpStreamId and RtpStreamId are already defined on RTP level by -avtext-rid. If we have preferences on how to best use them with redundancy RTP streams in general, I suggest we add text to -mmusic-rid about it. This would be regardless if we go for option A or B, but decided once and for all, thus applicable to RFC 4588 rtx and FLEX-FEC alike. /Bo (as individual) > > > -- > Iñaki Baz Castillo > <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ mmusic mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic