Re: Unknown key shares in MMUSIC

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Martin Thomson <[email protected]>
wrote:

> After completely failing to remember and take into account feedback
> during the avtcore meeting last time (thanks for the reminder
> Jonathan), I would like to draw the attention of this group to this
> draft:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thomson-avtcore-sdp-uks/
>
> The latest version builds on the a=dtls-id work in this group.
> However, Jonathan's reminder highlighted a critical shortcoming of
> that: it only works for DTLS.  We still have uses of TLS-over-TCP that
> would not be addressed by the current iteration of the draft (though
> they would have for the previous version).
>
> One relatively simple solution is to define dtls-id as tls-id instead,
> but that's disruptive.
>
> I'd like to discuss this issue with an eye to resolving it before or
> at Chicago; I realize that there is a probably a tight agenda, but the
> outcome of that discussion might affect a very-far-advanced
> draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-21.
>

Alternatively we can keep dtls-id the way it is currently defined and
define tls-id to be used for TLS-over-TCP  in the new draft.

I would also prefer a more generic name for the TLS extension itself. It
does not have to be related to SDP, so some sort of endpoint_id would work
better then sdp_dtls_id.

Regards,
_____________
Roman Shpount

_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic