Re: "a=extmap" with BUNDLE

Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mmusic
Message-ID <CALiegfmDH4a8nM08ify77pcz+az38KbJ3=x1n-dso7SYoODD1A@mail.gmail.com>
2017-03-24 19:28 GMT+01:00 Taylor Brandstetter <[email protected]>:
> saw that. Which means that individual documents are responsible for defining
> how their extensions work with BUNDLE.
>
> But something still would need to define the general restrictions for using
> "extmap" with BUNDLE, such as the ID restriction. Or is that just something
> that's common sense and doesn't need to be specified?

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5285#section-6 just mandates that the
IDs must be unique within a m= section, but at the end, all the WebRC
implementations use unique ID values across the entire SDP.

There are some RTP extensions, such as
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-holmer-rmcat-transport-wide-cc-extensions-01,
that work at *transport* level (rather than at m= section level), but
nothing prevents such a spec to work even if its ID is not unique
within the m= sections.

This is, IMHO we don't need a global behavior/requirement for the ID
values within bundled m= sections.


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<[email protected]>

_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.