Re: [rtcweb] BUNDLE: Attempting to resolve security consideration
Eric Rescorla <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mmusic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABcZeBNX+Ry7cARHCf5PD5VJ=UB9FBu-MvxUra2TBSTzO-FjGQ@mail.gmail.com> |
LGTM On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Magnus Westerlund < [email protected]> wrote: > Den 2017-03-27 kl. 09:52, skrev Eric Rescorla: > >> >> >> On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Magnus Westerlund >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I have attempted to address the issue discussed below by >> reformulating that paragraph to read: >> >> When the BUNDLE extension is used, the set of configurations of the >> security mechanism used in all the bundled media descriptions will >> need to be compatible for simultaneously use, at least per >> direction >> or endpoint. >> >> >> I'm not sure I understand what "compatible for simultaneously use" means. >> >> > That if one have multiple configurations they can co-exist in the same > BUNDLED context beging used in parallel. Is this better? > > When the BUNDLE extension is used, the set of configurations of the > security mechanism used in all the bundled media descriptions will > need to be compatible so that they can simultaneously used in > parallel, at least per direction or endpoint. > > > > Cheers > > > Magnus Westerlund > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Media Technologies, Ericsson Research > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 > Färögatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 > SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: [email protected] > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ mmusic mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic