Re: "a=extmap" with BUNDLE
Suhas Nandakumar <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mmusic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMRcRGQm3oKeS+gGLreq_xfhfb5UYFHhPmFN9QSysCz4DwE4Eg@mail.gmail.com> |
Since extmap is currently categorized under category of SPECIAL, at the minimum we need BUNDLE draft to describe its behavior for MID RTP Header extension under multiplexing, if it is not already doing so On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 1:20 AM, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty) <[email protected]> wrote: > The issue is uniqueness of the extmap id for mid not the mid value itself > (identification-tag). > > Mo > > On Mar 27, 2017, at 10:38 PM, Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On 3/27/17 7:08 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > > > So IMHO, the immediate issue is in BUNDLE spec [*] which defines the > > MID stuff but does not mandate the MID ID to be unique in the whole > > SDP. > > This is already required by section 4 of RFC5888: > > The identification-tag MUST be unique within an SDP session > description. > > Thanks, > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > mmusic mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic > > _______________________________________________ > mmusic mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic > _______________________________________________ mmusic mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic