Re: [MMUSIC] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-22

Hi Christer,

This sounds good to me.

Regards,

_____________
Roman Shpount

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Christer Holmberg <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Roman,
>
>
>
> What about:
>
>
>
> “…media packets in the any previously established DTLS association and…”
>
>
>
> That covers both the currently established and already closed associations.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Christer
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Roman Shpount [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* 28 March 2017 02:58
> *To:* Christer Holmberg <[email protected]>
> *Cc:* Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]>; draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp.
> [email protected]; General Area Review Team <[email protected]>; IETF MMUSIC WG
> <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* Re: [MMUSIC] [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of
> draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-22
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Christer Holmberg <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> >Regarding the following in section 5.1:
> >
> >    When an offerer or answerer indicates that it wants to establish a
> >    new DTLS association, it needs to make sure that media packets in the
> >    existing DTLS association and new DTLS association can be de-
> >    multiplexed.
> >
> >This text presumes there is an existing association. To explicitly cover
> the case where there is not, I suggest the following:
> >
> >    When an offerer or answerer indicates that it wants to establish a
> >    new DTLS association to replace an existing association, it needs to
> >    ensure that media packets in the existing DTLS association and new
> >    DTLS association can be de-multiplexed.
>
> I could do that. Or, I could use say "make sure that media packets in
> *any* existing DTLS association"
>
>
>
> If we are nitpicking we need to define what "existing" DTLS association
> means here. In this particular case this means any DTLS association for
> which it still possible to receive packets. This includes currently
> established DTLS associations as well as any DTLS association which were
> closed but can still receive packets due to network transmission delays.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> _____________
> Roman Shpount
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art