Re: New version of SDP UKS draft

On 22 April 2017 at 03:44, Roman Shpount <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have already mentioned that I prefer not to call this extension
> sdp_tls_id. Since this extension applies to Jingle and ORTC, this extension
> is not SDP specific. It should be called simply tls_id or tls_helo_id.

I apologize for missing this.  I've updated my copy of the draft.
I've named it external_session_id/ExternalSessionId so that it can be
used in some other context without issues.

Making this generic means that this document needs to either define
how the attribute is used generically, or it needs to state that
things other than SDP aren't in scope.

I've chosen to limit this to SDP.  If another protocol wants to fix
this problem, then they need to define the a=tls-id equivalent anyway;
they can define the hook into using this extension at the same time.