Re: New version of SDP UKS draft

On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 7:08 PM, Martin Thomson <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On 22 April 2017 at 03:44, Roman Shpount <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I have already mentioned that I prefer not to call this extension
> > sdp_tls_id. Since this extension applies to Jingle and ORTC, this
> extension
> > is not SDP specific. It should be called simply tls_id or tls_helo_id.
>
> I apologize for missing this.  I've updated my copy of the draft.
> I've named it external_session_id/ExternalSessionId so that it can be
> used in some other context without issues.
>
> Making this generic means that this document needs to either define
> how the attribute is used generically, or it needs to state that
> things other than SDP aren't in scope.
>
> I've chosen to limit this to SDP.  If another protocol wants to fix
> this problem, then they need to define the a=tls-id equivalent anyway;
> they can define the hook into using this extension at the same time.
>

I think we can say that this document is limited to SDP with other
protocols out of scope. ORT and Jingle can define how to signal tls-id in
separate documents.

Regards,
_____________
Roman Shpount

_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic