Re: 1-week WGLC on recent changes in draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp
Martin Thomson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mmusic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABkgnnUBumm2+EHhG56NFTwsfhzOX1d1y-Lu44BRUL17z1o8Wg@mail.gmail.com> |
On 27 April 2017 at 20:30, Christer Holmberg <[email protected]> wrote: > We COULD say that the offerer MUST NOT process the ClientHello before it > has received the answer, but I am not sure we say more than that… I wouldn't do that; the real gate here is that they not call the handshake done and proceed to exchange data. Frankly, you could even complete the handshake and buffer incoming data without any real exposure. Sending is not a good idea and playing out what you receive is equally unwise. Those are what you need to safeguard. (Fluffy might disagree; #include other threads regarding W3C liaison). _______________________________________________ mmusic mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic