Re: 1-week WGLC on recent changes in draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp

Martin Thomson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mmusic
Message-ID <CABkgnnURhoXu2K_jHmQTEUXGjyA7wh_s2aP8BtpKAD1wbK0gUA@mail.gmail.com> 
On 27 April 2017 at 21:38, Christer Holmberg
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Fair enough. So, do we want to say that the offerer may complete the
> handshake, and buffer received data, before it has received the answer,
> but the offerer shall not process received data, or send data, before it
> has received the answer?

"MAY buffer received packets" might be better.  As the later
discussion shows, processing the ClientHello risks skipping the UKS
checks, so that would be unwise.  And Roman points out assymmetric
paths (I suppose that could happen; though it seems unwise that never
stopped anyone before).
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.