RFC 5761 updated by both draft-mux-exclusive and RFC 8035

Hi,

draft-mux-exclusive updates section 5.1.1 of RFC 5761. Now, RFC 8035 also updates section 5.1.1 of RFC 8035.

draft-mux-exclusive keeps the existing text, and adds some new (<new></new>).


Update to 4th paragraph of section 5.1.1


OLD TEXT (RFC 5761):

   If the answer does not contain an "a=rtcp-mux" attribute, the offerer
   MUST NOT multiplex RTP and RTCP packets on a single port.  Instead,
   it should send and receive RTCP on a port allocated according to the
   usual port-selection rules (either the port pair, or a signalled port
   if the "a=rtcp:" attribute [10] is also included).  This will occur
   when talking to a peer that does not understand the "a=rtcp-mux"
   attribute.



NEW TEXT (RFC 8035):

   If the answer does not contain an "a=rtcp-mux" attribute, the offerer
   MUST NOT multiplex RTP and RTCP packets on a single port.  Instead,
   it should send and receive RTCP on a port allocated according to the
   usual port-selection rules (either the port pair, or a signalled port
   if the "a=rtcp:" attribute [10] is also included).  This will occur
   when talking to a peer that does not understand the "a=rtcp-mux"
   attribute.


As we can see, the original text is identical in 5761 and 8035. So, there is no clash. So far so good.

draft-mux-exclusive keeps the existing text, and adds some new (<new></new>).


NEW TEXT (draft-mux-exclusive):

   If the answer does not contain an "a=rtcp-mux" attribute, the offerer
   MUST NOT multiplex RTP and RTCP packets on a single port.  Instead,
   it should send and receive RTCP on a port allocated according to the
   usual port-selection rules (either the port pair, or a signaled port
   if the "a=rtcp:" attribute [10] is also included).  This will occur
   when talking to a peer that does not understand the "a=rtcp-mux"
   attribute. <new> However, if the offerer indicated in the offer that it is
   not able to send and receive RTCP on a separate port, the offerer
   MUST disable the media streams associated with the attribute. The
   mechanism for indicating that the offerer is not able to send and
   receive RTCP on a separate port is outside the scope of this
   specification.</new>


Now, the issue is that, following the update in RFC 8035, the text is no longer within the 4th paragraph of section 5.1.1. So, should we:

1) within draft-mux-exclusive, indicate that both RFC 5761 and RFC 8035 are updated; or
2) within draft-mux-exclusive, add a note indicating which paragraph is affected following the update in RFC 8035
3) within draft-mux-exclusive, ONLY update RFC 8035; or
4) o nothing

My first reaction would be to go for option 2), as there IMO is no reason to formally update the text in RFC 8035.

Regards,

Christer

_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic