Re: starting DTLS handshake before the answer is received (dtls-sdp draft)
Bernard Aboba <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mmusic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAOW+2dvAPQ-TwsARY2342eck4yOuLu_is7bd5OQCsSQ2Vu1Vzw@mail.gmail.com> |
Roman Shpount said: "We also are planning to update the dtls-sdp draft which will prohibit to start DTLS handshake until the answer is received." [BA] The logic here is that in WebRTC an incoming DTLS packet cannot be responded to until "consent" is provided, which requires an ICE request and response, which needs the remote ICE ufrag/password, which is in the answer. While I can understand explaining this in the dratf, a prohibition seems redundant, because it already follows from other requirements (such as consent and full ICE). It's a bit like passing a law prohibiting objects in earth's gravity from "falling up" - gravity just doesn't work that way, so no need for a law. Also, there can be situations with ICE lite, or with ORTC where ICE O/A could be separated from DTLS O/A), so consent could exist prior to receipt of the DTLS answer, where the original logic wouldn't hold. _______________________________________________ mmusic mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic