Re: draft-dtls-sdp: Allow offerer to establish DTLS association before it has received the SDP answer?

Christer Holmberg <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mmusic
Message-ID <D54DB2E1.1D299%[email protected]>
Hi,

I have updated the PR. The text now says that the offer must not
*finalise* the DTLS handshake until it has received the answer.

The text still allows to process media that is received before the answer
is received. I know Martin doesn¹t like that, and I have no idea what the
sec people will think about it, but I am trying to find some common
ground. I want to move the draft forward.

Is this something everyone can live with?

Š


>> Also, if I understand the FEDEX use-case, not only would you have to be
>> able to receive media - if you are e.g., going to provide DTMFs you
>>could
>> also have to SEND data? Or?
>
>Yeah, sending DTMF to who-knows isn't a good idea.  I'm not clear on
>whether sending DTMF is part of the arrangement.  Sounds like a great
>way to avoid tarriffs altogether; I'm surprised that service providers
>would even allow that.

Actually, before you get the SDP answer you can¹t send any DTMFsŠ

Regards,

Christer
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.