Re: actpass redux
Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mmusic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 6/9/17 9:17 AM, Cullen Jennings wrote: > >> On Jun 8, 2017, at 6:49 PM, Roman Shpount <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Because of this, I think for the best interop, offerer MUST specify actpass for both initial and subsequent offers but answerer MUST be able to handle active and passive setup roles as well. > > that works for me I don't understand what this accomplishes. If you must be able to accept anything in a received offer, then what is gained by restricting what can be used in an offer? Thanks, Paul