Re: it's time to expel SDP from our lives
Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mmusic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 6/14/17 7:25 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > 2017-06-14 13:20 GMT+02:00 Christer Holmberg <[email protected]>: >>> And that's why SDP already exists. But that does not mean that we need >>> that WebRTC is SDP based. >> >> Well, THAT discussion IS off-topic for MMUSIC :) >> >> The choice to use SDP was done by RTCWEB, wasn’t it? > > Right. However, the problem I see is that the only WG defining > multimedia parameters is MMUSIC, and it defines those within the SDP > context, making it hard to enable any other approach than SDP. Well, there has to be *some* agreed upon means for defining these parameters. SDP is being used because that is what there is, even though it is far from ideal. Certainly something else could be used, but then that needs to be defined. I guess you are arguing that this partition the definition, separating semantics from syntax. While that is certainly possible, it probably won't make the job simpler. What is needed is a concrete proposal. Thanks, Paul _______________________________________________ mmusic mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic