Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5939 (5042)
Ben Campbell <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mmusic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, This seems correct to me on a quick scan, modulo the work around opportunistic srtp, which shouldn’t affect the erratum at this point. Thoughts? Thanks! Ben. > Begin forwarded message: > > From: RFC Errata System <[email protected]> > Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5939 (5042) > Date: June 16, 2017 at 11:05:54 AM CDT > To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] > Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5939, > "Session Description Protocol (SDP) Capability Negotiation". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5042 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Typo in example <[email protected]> > > Section: 4.2 > > Original Text > ------------- > m=audio 59000 UDP/TLS/RTP/AVP 98 > > Corrected Text > -------------- > m=audio 59000 UDP/TLS/RTP/SAVP 98 > > Notes > ----- > The example missed an S in the mine type. The list of allowed types is at https://www.iana.org/assignments/sdp-parameters/sdp-parameters.xhtml#sdp-parameters-2 and UDP/TLS/RTP/AVP is not a registered device. Because this is over TLS, it is a SRTP (not RTP) and should use SAVP not AVP. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC5939 (draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-capability-negotiation-13) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Session Description Protocol (SDP) Capability Negotiation > Publication Date : September 2010 > Author(s) : F. Andreasen > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Multiparty Multimedia Session Control RAI > Area : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG _______________________________________________ mmusic mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic