Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis-19.txt
"Ali C. Begen" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mmusic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAA4Mczu8a48rqQ7RRFKVOs83+9pK0DPcbbYdLa9y-NHOUt8B2w@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Paul Thanks for catching the error. It is fixed and submitted now. -acbegen On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 6:02 PM, Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Ali, > > On 6/16/17 6:32 PM, Ali C. Begen wrote: > >> Hi everyone >> >> There have been some comments on and off the list regarding the 4566bis >> draft and with this update, I am hoping that I made all the changed asked >> for. There were a few errors that were taken care of, some ABNF syntax has >> been improved, references have been updated, etc. >> >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566b >> is-18&url2=draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis-19 >> >> Please check whether you have outstanding issues or not. I saw that the >> chairs updated the milestone for this draft, and from my perspective, the >> draft is ready to go to WGLC. >> > > I like the change to the grammar that moves the notation for > optionality/repetition of individual fields from the definition of those > fields to the overall definition of the session-description: > > session-description = proto-version > origin-field > session-name-field > [information-field] > [uri-field] > *email-fields > *phone-fields > [connection-field] > *bandwidth-fields > 1*time-fields > [key-field] > *attribute-fields > *media-descriptions > > However, this change induced a bug in the definition of media-descriptions: > > media-descriptions = media-field > information-field > *connection-field > bandwidth-fields > key-field > attribute-fields > > This needs the same changes made to session-description. So this needs to > be changed to: > > media-descriptions = media-field > [information-field] > *connection-field > *bandwidth-fields > [key-field] > *attribute-fields > > Also this change does result in some very odd naming, where the names of > some fields are plural but now ought to be singular. These ought to be > fixed. Specifically: > > email-fields => email-field > phone-fields => phone-field > bandwidth-fields => bandwidth-field > time-fields => time-field > attribute-fields => attribute-field > media-descriptions => media-description > > Otherwise the new version seems good to me. > > Thanks, > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > mmusic mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic > _______________________________________________ mmusic mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic