Re: Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-28: (with COMMENT)

Hi,

>>>I would think the long-form title of this document should include "TLS,"
>>> to
>>> reflect that it also contains TLS-related procedures.
>> The issue is that the document doesn¹t really define the O/A procedures
>> for TLS. It simply adds the usage of the tls-id attribute to the
>>existing
>> procedures defined elsewhere.
>
>Right, so make that clear. I note that simply adding "and Identification
>of TLS Connections" to the end is ambiguous (since it makes it sound
>like it defines O/A for TLS), but you can fix this by reversing the
>existing title; e.g., something like: "Establishing Datagram Transport
>Layer Security (DTLS) Using the Session Description Protocol (SDP)
>Offer/Answer Mechanism and Identification of Transport Layer Security
>(TLS) Connections in SDP"

Works for me.

Regards,

Christer

_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic