Re: Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-28: (with COMMENT)

> On Aug 23, 2017, at 1:30 PM, Adam Roach <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On 8/23/17 04:38, Christer Holmberg wrote:
>> 
>>> I would think the long-form title of this document should include "TLS,"
>>> to
>>> reflect that it also contains TLS-related procedures.
>> The issue is that the document doesn¹t really define the O/A procedures
>> for TLS. It simply adds the usage of the tls-id attribute to the existing
>> procedures defined elsewhere.
> 
> Right, so make that clear. I note that simply adding "and Identification of TLS Connections" to the end is ambiguous (since it makes it sound like it defines O/A for TLS), but you can fix this by reversing the existing title; e.g., something like: "Establishing Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Using the Session Description Protocol (SDP) Offer/Answer Mechanism and Identification of Transport Layer Security (TLS) Connections in SDP”

Wow, that’s petty cumbersome as a title—it’s pretty much an abstract. Does it need that much detail?

_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic