Re: DTLS-SDP and JSEP Conflicts

On 8/28/17 5:12 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> I don’t know if you left the following out by mistake, if you assumed 
> the issue had been solved, or if I simply missed it, but just in case:
>
> >DTLS-SDP: "the offerer and answerer generate their own local 'tls-id' 
> attribute
> >values, and the combination of both values identify the DTLS 
> association."
> >
> >JSEP: "If this is an answer, the tls-id value, if present, MUST be 
> the same as
> >in the offer.”

That was my "Issue 1b":

> (Issue 1b) Additionally the final sentence of that bullet ("If this is 
> an answer, the tls-id value, if present, MUST be the same as in the 
> offer") conflicts with the definition of tls-id ("the offerer and 
> answerer generate their own local 'tls-id' attribute values, and the 
> combination of both values identify the DTLS association"). In this 
> case, the DTLS-SDP document would appear to be correct (the fact that 
> the two parties choose different IDs is integral to the mechanism's 
> design), so JSEP needs to change.

/a

_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic