Re: k= and draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis

I don’t think we can remove it – we need to document it for legacy reasons, if nothing else – but we can certainly strengthen the warnings not to use it.

Colin



> On 8 Sep 2017, at 08:14, Ali C. Begen <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I have not seen it being used, but it could be just me who has not seen it. Will be happy to remove it, if everyone agrees.
> 
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:26 AM, Cullen Jennings <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Do we still need the "k=" line in SDP? Could we just remove all of section 5.12 ?
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic



-- 
Colin Perkins
https://csperkins.org/

_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic