Re: Existing missmatch between SDP mux and BUNDLE

Hi,

>> It depends on how we interpret "associated with"
>
> That's why I purged "associated with" from the BUNDLE spec: https://github.com/taylor-b/draft-sdp-bundle/pull/1 
>
> It almost always can be interpreted in multiple ways. Unfortunately this never got integrated, I assume because I was too late.

No, you were not :) I have been looking at your CR, and have been considering to integrate it, but I lately I have been so busy with draft-dtls-sdp etc.

Having said that, we have changed the terminology in bundle a number of times already - we really need to stop at some point.

The history of "associated" is when people commented that one cannot add an attribute, address etc to an m- line (because attributes, c- lines and m- lines are separate SDP properties). So, instead of talking about adding those to an m- line talk about associating those with an m- line.

Now, if I remember the changes in your PR correctly, you are talking about "media descriptions", which would be an "envelope" containing the m- line, the address and attributes associated with that m- line. Then you could say "add attribute to the media description", etc. Right?

Regards,

Christer
_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic