Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis-23: media description vs media-level section

I think we should removee the media-level section, seems redundant and
stick with media description.

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:39 PM, Christer Holmberg <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> One editorial comment:
>
> The draft uses both "media description" and "media-level section"
> terminology, but at least I can't see any difference. The definition of
> those terms are also identical:
>
>         "Each media description starts with an "m=" line and is terminated
> by either the next "m=" line..."             (section 5.14)
>
> ...and:
>
>         "Each media-level section starts with an "m=" line and continues
> to the next media-level section..."    (section 5)
>
> "media-level section" only appears in one paragraph of the whole document.
>
> Do we need both?
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mmusic [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Flemming
> Andreasen
> Sent: 18 September 2017 15:59
> To: mmusic <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> Subject: [MMUSIC] WGLC on draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis-23
>
> Greetings MMUSIC
>
> This is to announce a 2 week WGLC on the draft:
>
>       https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis-23.txt
>
> as Proposed Standard. Please review and provide any comments you may have
> on the document by Monday, October 2, 2017. Comments should be sent to the
> document authors and the MMUSIC WG list. If you review the document but do
> not have any comments, please send a note to that effect as well.
>
> Thanks
>
> -- Flemming (MMUSIC co-chair)
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>

_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic