Re: Presentation for a call if DTLS Association be started if not requested in the offer
Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> Thu, 28 Sep 2017 15:19:17 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mmusic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABcZeBM1bBs9aKomMankUwvL0B5Yzr6b8E1h-7Zoc0jg_t96Wg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Christer Holmberg < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > >The relevant text is here https://tools.ietf.org/html/ > draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-23#section-5.8.3 > > > > tls-id value, which MUST be set according to > > [I-D.ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp], Section 5. If this is a re-offer > > and the tls-id value is different from that presently in use, > > the DTLS connection is not being continued and the remote > > description MUST be part of an ICE restart, together with new > > ufrag and password values. If this is an answer, the tls-id > > value, if present, MUST be the same as in the offer. > > > > This is no longer precisely correct because you've made the answerer > provide its own tls-id, > > but the clear implication is that the answerer cannot unilaterally > restart DTLS. It's when > > we went to update it to handle the newer syntax, we found the conflict. > > It’s true that the answerer provides its own tls-id, but I don’t > understand why that would imply that it can’t restart DTLS. > As I said, the original text assumed that the answerer *copied* the TLS-ID and that is because we assumed that the answerer couldn't, so just because we've changed the syntax doesn't mean we think the logic should change. Also, I’d like to hear your suggestion on how to handle backward > compatibility with endpoints that don’t support tls-id (read: endpoints > that may trigger new DTLS association in the answer). Maybe the problem > will go away one day, but I don’t think we can just close our eyes and wait > for that day to come… > Which endpoints do that? Because that's absolutely going to be forbidden by JSEP. -Ekr > > Regards, > > Christer > > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Roman Shpount <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I would also like to see if and how exactly allowing new DTLS association >> when not requested in the offer, contradicts JSEP. >> >> Roman Shpount >> >> >> On Sep 28, 2017 02:22, "Christer Holmberg" <[email protected] >> m> wrote: >> >> Thanks Roman! >> >> I would request those that do NOT want to allow an answerer to trigger a >> new DTLS association to prepare a description (verbally or using slides) on >> how they suggest handling interoperability with legacy peers that may >> trigger a new DTLS association in the answer. >> >> Regards, >> >> Christer >> >> From: Roman Shpount <[email protected]> >> Date: Thursday 28 September 2017 at 08:37 >> To: Christer Holmberg <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" >> <[email protected]>, Ben Campbell <[email protected]>, Bernard Aboba < >> [email protected]>, Bo Burman <[email protected]>, Eric >> Rescorla <[email protected]>, Flemming Andreasen <[email protected]>, >> Jonathan Lennox <[email protected]>, Justin Uberti <[email protected]>, >> "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" < >> [email protected]> >> Subject: Presentation for a call if DTLS Association be started if not >> requested in the offer >> >> Hi All, >> >> Attached is the presentation for the call tomorrow (or later today) >> >> Once again, conference call information: >> >> *Join the meeting: join.me/112-807-485 <https://join.me/112-807-485>* >> >> Thursday, September 28, 2017 12:00 PM >> Eastern Time (US & Canada) >> In my time zone? <https://join.me/timezone/1506614400000/1506621600000> >> *To dial in by phone:* >> >> United States - Los Angeles, CA >> *+1.213.226.1066 <+1.213.226.1066,,112807485#>* >> >> United States - New York, NY >> *+1.646.307.1990 <+1.646.307.1990,,112807485#>* >> >> United States - San Francisco, CA >> *+1.415.594.5500 <+1.415.594.5500,,112807485#>* >> >> United States - Washington, DC >> *+1.202.602.1295 <+1.202.602.1295,,112807485#>* >> >> Australia - Sydney >> *+61.2.9191.6319 <+61.2.9191.6319,,112807485#>* >> >> France - Paris >> *+33.1.8288.3590 <+33.1.8288.3590,,112807485#>* >> >> Germany - Berlin >> *+49.30.2240.3071 <+49.30.2240.3071,,112807485#>* >> >> Singapore - national >> *+65.3158.1842 <+65.3158.1842,,112807485#>* >> >> United Kingdom - London >> *+44.20.3582.4515 <+44.20.3582.4515,,112807485#>* >> >> More phone numbers <https://join.me/intphone/112807485/0> >> >> Conference ID: >> *112-807-485 #* >> >> Need to share screen? Download the app <https://join.me/app> >> >> Regards, >> >> _____________ >> Roman Shpount >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ mmusic mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic