Re: Issue 59: Editorial comments from Tero (was: Comments of draft-ietf-mobike-protocol-04.txt)

[email protected] writes:
> > 11)
> > 
> > The section 6.1 should probably also mention that NO_NATS_ALLOWED
> > might be used with IPv6 in general, where NATs are not (yet) used.
> 
> I think IPv6 implementations will often need to support NAT
> traversal anyway, because UDP is more likely to get through
> stateful firewalls than plain ESP... 
> 
> But yes, perhaps IPv6 could be mentioned there anyway.  How 
> about rephrasing that to "This feature is mainly intendeed for 
> IPv6 and site-to-site VPN cases, where..."?

That would be enough for me.
-- 
[email protected]