Issue 46 (was: protocol draft status and moving forward)

Jari Arkko writes:
> The issue list is at [3]. The issues that I believe still
> need further discussion are
> 
>      46 - question about additional addresses

There are some changes still missing from the 05 for this.

The beginning of the 3.6 would need to be changed, i.e. change

----------------------------------------------------------------------
   As described in Section 3.4, both the initiator and responder can
   send a list of additional addresses in the IKE_AUTH exchange.  This
   information can be updated by sending an INFORMATIONAL exchange
   request message that contains either one or more ADDITIONAL_IP4/
   6_ADDRESS notifications or the NO_ADDITIONAL_ADDRESSES notification.
   The message exchange will look as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

to

----------------------------------------------------------------------
   As described in Section 3.4, both the initiator and responder can
   send a list of additional addresses in the IKE_AUTH exchange.  This
   information can be updated by sending an INFORMATIONAL exchange
   request message that contains either one or more ADDITIONAL_IP4/
   6_ADDRESS notifications or the NO_ADDITIONAL_ADDRESSES
   notification. The NO_ADDITIONAL_ADDRESSES notify is used to
   indicate that there are no additional addresses besides the address
   used in the IP-headers. The ADDITIONAL_IP4/6_ADDRESS are used to
   give complete list of additional addresses (in addition to the one
   in the IP-header). The new address list will completely overwrite
   the previous list.

   The message exchange will look as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-- 
[email protected]