open issue status...

Technical:
=======

68 - conformance requirements
   We have converged on text. But Mohan and Pasi
   are still discussing the rationale of why the requirements
   can be what they are. Waiting for Pasi and Mohan to
   post a note on whether additional clarification is needed.

   Action: Pasi & Mohan

60 - addresses from IKE_SA_INIT or IKE_SA_AUTH?
   Ongoing debate between Pasi and Tero. We
   need to discuss this in the meeting, but I will
   also try to get Pasi and Tero talk about it
   prior to the meeting.

   Action: Pasi and Tero and then to agree about this
   in the meeting.

58 - deleting addresses
  No changes to the behaviour, but current
  text was perhaps insufficiently clear. Someone
  to send text.

  Action: Unless someone else sends text, Pasi will
  write this.

56 - ingress filtering compatibility
  No changes to the design decision, i.e., we
  only support bidirectional paths. But again
  there's some debate about the limitation
  text's clarity in Section 1.2, the issue is
  simply the use of "address pair" vs. "path".
  There's a text proposal from Tero, but
  Pasi also said he knows how to formulate the
  text.

  Action: Pasi, others to agree or discuss on list

52 - security of address updates
  Leaning on to change nothing. We know
  address updates are less secure if NO_NAT_ALLOWED
  is used. As for the suggested heuristics - there's
  a worry that they are not bulletproof, and its simply
  better to test as IKEv2 does.

  Action: to agree about this in the meeting.

51 - SPI collisions
  This already happens in IKEv1, v2, and 2401bis.
  Uncertain if we should add anything about this
  in MOBIKE.

  Action: to agree about this in the meeting.

Editorial:
======

64 - editorial comments/questions from Stephane
   These questions have been mostly answered
   by Tero and Stephane seemed OK with the
   answer. The only remaining issue is whether
   the port 4500 behaviour needs to be explained
   in the draft. Waiting for Tero to post a suggestion
   about this or to say nothing is needed.

   Action: Tero

59 - editorial comments from Tero
  Mostly in -05 already, but some missing
  ones being discussed. Most solved, but
  Pasi to post final text suggestion to the
  list.

  Action: Tero

54 - editorial comments from marcelo
  Jari posted a proposal on what needs to
  be changed and how.

  Action: Marcelo to agree or discuss, Pasi to edit in.

46 - questions about ADDITIONAL_*_ADDRESSES
  Editorial since we're not revisiting an earlier decision
  to have full updates instead of diffs. Tero has a
  text clarification. OK?

  Action: Everyone to agree on Tero's suggestion or
  send better text.

45 - clarifications to security considerations
  After a discussion with Pasi, we are leaning towards
  not changing anything.

  Action: Mohan to agree or discuss.

<http://www.vpnc.org/ietf-mobike/issue64.txt>