Issue 71: Failing RR (was: Do we need text about failing RR)
Tero Kivinen <[email protected]> Mon, 14 Nov 2005 17:25:53 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] writes: > Discussing this face-to-face clarified the situation: I guess > all we need is a way for the initiator to discover the situation. > > Your proposal about considering the IP address when deciding > whether to start DPD sounds like the way to go. Could you > figure out what needs to be added and/or changed in the draft > to make this work? Hmm... I think we need new section probably after "Failure Recover and Timeouts" explaining DPD behavior: X.X Dead Peer Detection MOBIKE protocol uses same DPD method than normal IKEv2, but as the IP addresses might change in the MOBIKE also they should be taken account when determing whether the other peer is alive and in sync with address updates. This means that, if there is incoming traffic, but that does not use current address pair, that should not be considered to proof that the other end is alive. -- [email protected]