Re: Issue 71: Failing RR (was: Do we need text about failing RR)

Jari Arkko wrote:
> OK. Somewhat edited version below:
> 
>    "MOBIKE uses the same Dead Peer Detection method as normal
>    IKEv2, but as addresses may change, it is not sufficient to
>    just verify that the peer is alive, but also that it is
>    synchronized with the address updates and has not, for
>    instance, ignored an address update due to failure to complete
>    return routability test. This means that when there are
>    incoming IPsec packets, MOBIKE nodes SHOULD inspect the
>    addresses used in those packets and determine that they
>    correspond to those that should be employed. If they do not,
>    such packets SHOULD NOT be used as evidence that the peer is
>    able to communicate with this node and or that the peer has
>    received all address updates."

Looks OK to me.

Best regards,
Pasi