Re: protocol draft progress and end of last call discussion

No further comments were received during this
period. I also personally re-reviewed the specification
today one more time and as far as I could see, it matches
the consensus on the issues we had in WGLC.

As a result, we will be sending the draft to the ADs.

--Jari

Jari Arkko wrote:

>MOBIKE protocol document WGLC ended earlier, with a
>number of issues raised during the process. We have
>since then been discussing resolutions for these issues.
>There were quite many issues, but fortunately most if
>not even all of the issues had no impact on bits on the
>wire. I would like to to thank everyone who reviewed
>the document and participated in the discussion to
>produce text proposals - the amount of input we have gotten
>has been impressive.
>
> From what I can observe, we have converged on all issues
>in the meeting and on the mailing list. Pasi has submitted
>a 06 version which is already available in the directories [1].
>
>We are now setting some time for the WG to check that
>the resolutions are indeed in the -06 as planned and,
>if you did not participate IETF-64, that you agree with
>the resolutions of issues that were discussed in the meeting
>[2, 3] and subsequently on the list.
>
>Please verify that the issues that you raised were correctly
>brought to the document according to the discussion, as
>well as perform a "sanity check" for the -06 version. Please
>do this prior to 24th of November, 2005 so that we can submit
>the draft to AD/IESG consideration (or I-D submission if mistakes
>are found) by the end of next week.
>
>Jari Arkko
>Co-chair of the MOBIKE WG
>
>[1] http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mobike-protocol-06.txt
>[2] http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/05nov/minutes/mobike.txt
>[3] http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/05nov/slides/mobike-4.ppt
>
>_______________________________________________
>Mobike mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.machshav.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mobike
>
>
>  
>