D109 design draft issue: security considerations
Tero Kivinen <[email protected]> Tue, 3 Jan 2006 19:12:49 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jari Arkko writes: [issue list: http://www.kivinen.iki.fi/ietf/mobike-design-issues.html working copy of document: http://www.kivinen.iki.fi/ietf/draft-ietf-mobike-design-06.txt] > > 7. Security Considerations > > This section seems weak compared to the one in > the protocol draft. Consider simply referring to the > protocol spec unless there is some new information > (e.g. design decisions not covered in the protocol > spec). As we do not really define protocol here, there is not that much of real security considerations. The current security considerations lists the generic problems against all protocols of this type. I am not sure adding pointer to the protocol document helps that much, as I assume people will read the protocol document anyways, but perhaps adding text "See Security considerations section of <xref target="I-D.ietf-mobike-protocol"/> for more information about security considerations of the actual protocol." helps. -- [email protected]