Re: D116 Design draft, misc. comments
"Tschofenig, Hannes" <[email protected]> Thu, 5 Jan 2006 13:05:53 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <ECDC9C7BC7809340842C0E7FCF48C393A80273@MCHP7IEA.ww002.siemens.net> |
hi tero, > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Tero Kivinen [mailto:[email protected]] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. Januar 2006 12:13 > An: Tschofenig, Hannes > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [Mobike] D116 Design draft, misc. comments > > Tschofenig, Hannes writes: > > > > - Section 5.2.1, a couple of informative references might be > > > > in order (UNSAF, MIDCOM, NSIS NATFW) > > > > > > Sure, give RFC / Internet-draft names, I will add them. > > > > here are the references: > > > > [UNSAF] Daigle, L. and IAB, "IAB Considerations for UNilateral > > Self-Address Fixing (UNSAF) Across Network Address > > Translation", RFC 3424, November 2002. > > > > > > for midcom we could reference: > > > > [RFC3303] Srisuresh, P., Kuthan, J., Rosenberg, J., > Molitor, A. and A. > > Rayhan, "Middlebox communication architecture and > > framework", RFC 3303, August 2002. > > Added those. > > > [MIDCOM-MIB] Quittek, J., Stiemerling, M. and P. > Srisuresh, "Definitions of Managed Objects for Middlebox > Communication", draft-ietf-midcom-mib-05.txt (work in > progress), March 2005. > > Is the mib here really relevant for the mobike design? I think the > architecture and framework should be enough. I didn't add this one > yet. it is ok for me to reference just the framework. i guess that everyone then already understands what is meant. ciao hannes > > > here is the nsis reference: > > > > [NSISNATFW] Stiemerling, M., Tschofenig, H. and C. Aoun, > "A NAT/Firewall NSIS Signaling Layer Protocol (NSLP)", > Internet-Draft draft-ietf-nsis-nslp-natfw-08, October 2005. > > Added that. > -- > [email protected] >