Re: D109 design draft issue: security considerations

It treats only one aspect of unreliable indications (namely,
ICMP), and does not explain everything that should probably
be explained, if you compare with the protocol draft.

Tero Kivinen wrote:

>Jari Arkko writes:
>  
>
>>Yes. Maybe you could also cut the paragraph about
>>ICMP (since it isn't complete).
>>    
>>
>
>What do you mean that it is not complete?
>  
>