Re: Preliminary minutes from the WG last week

"Vijay Devarapalli" <[email protected]> Sun, 2 Apr 2006 23:28:26 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mobike
Message-ID <[email protected]>
hi Yaron,

I think Jim was talking about Mobile IPv6 and
Mobike. The drafts you point to below are all 
Mobile IPv4 related. 

Vijay

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Yaron Sheffer
> Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2006 3:39 AM
> To: 'Paul Hoffman'; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Mobike] Preliminary minutes from the WG last week
> 
> Regarding the combination of MOBIKE and Mobile IP, there are 3 current
> drafts in MIP4 that deal with this:
> 
> - draft-ietf-mip4-vpn-problem-solution-02 (this one is pre-MOBIKE)
> - draft-ietf-mip4-mobike-connectivity-00
> - draft-meghana-mip4-mobike-optimizations-00
> 
> So it's a stretch to say "don't do" MOBIKE and Mobile IP together.
> 
> 	Yaron
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Hoffman [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 5:49
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Mobike] Preliminary minutes from the WG last week
> 
> Please let me know if you have any changes.
> 
> MOBIKE WG minutes
> IETF 65
> 
> [deleted]
> 
> James Kempf - discussion in Mobile IP group - what happens if 
> you try to
> use Mobile IP and MOBIKE together? Some people believe the answer is
> "don't do that". May need an informational draft (as a new 
> work item) to
> address that.
> 
> [deleted]
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mobike mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.machshav.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mobike
>