Re: Closing some less controversial issues

Jari Arkko <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mobike
Organization None
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
The answer is yes. Pasi meant that since IKEv2
requires RFC 2401bis and MOBIKE requires IKEv2,
then MOBIKE has to assume RFC 2401bis also...

--Jari

Mohan Parthasarathy wrote:
> I agree to close all this. But i don't understand your conclusion on Issue 9.
> I am assuming the answer is yes.

> ----- Original Message ----- 
> Issue 9: "Does MOBIKE require RFC2401bis?"
> 
>    "IKEv2 requires RFC2401bis, and MOBIKE requires IKEv2."
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.