I've created a new issue in the issue list:
"Can the protocol recover from situations where the only
sign of problems is lack of packets from the other end?"
(http://www.vpnc.org/ietf-mobike/issues.html)
Many people at the WG meeting expressed opinions that this
should be handled somehow (in addition to handling e.g.
link-down triggers from layer 2, or something similar).
So far, I do not remember anyone saying that the protocol
does not need to handle this situation. But comments
are welcome.
Best regards,
Pasi
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.